GPGrossPatternRESEARCH SYSTEM
SEC CHECK OPERATIONAL
GROSSPATTERN / FUNDAMENTAL STATE / POINT IN TIME

XPO · Jun 30, 2016

XPO, Inc.. A multidimensional configuration derived from the filing available at this observation—never a composite score or recommendation.

STATE CAPABILITYLEVEL 3[email protected]
Inspectable configuration

State dimensions

Filing0001628280-16-018720General Corporate
Capex intensity77thOwn-history percentile · N=13
Evidence method

Level · gp.fundamentals.capex_revenue_ratio

2.97% · OPTIONAL · VALID

Operating cash generation100thOwn-history percentile · N=10
Evidence method

Ratio · gp.fundamentals.operating_cash_flow + gp.fundamentals.revenue

7.08% · OPTIONAL · VALID

Revenue growth33thOwn-history percentile · N=9
Evidence method

Yoy · gp.fundamentals.revenue

202.93% · CORE · VALID

Operating margin100thOwn-history percentile · N=13
Evidence method

Level · gp.fundamentals.operating_margin

4.62% · CORE · VALID

SBC intensity8thOwn-history percentile · N=13
Evidence method

Level · gp.fundamentals.sbc_revenue_ratio

0.23% · OPTIONAL · VALID

As-filed lineage

Fundamental state history

Each observation is tied to the filing and facts available at that report date. Amendments remain separate.

History37 statesSelf-history eligible
Period transition

What moved in the state?

Capex Intensity Decreased
Previous
3.23%
Current
2.97%
Delta
-0.27%
Cash Generation Increased
Previous
0.19%
Current
7.08%
Delta
6.88%
Growth Decreased
Previous
404.37%
Current
202.93%
Delta
-201.44%
Profitability Increased
Previous
1.76%
Current
4.62%
Delta
2.86%
Sbc Intensity Decreased
Previous
0.34%
Current
0.23%
Delta
-0.10%
Self-history only

Previous similar states

Similarity compares compatible valid dimensions from this issuer's own point-in-time history. No market-return claim is attached.

Not enough compatible prior states for a transparent self-history match.
Research Graph

Related governed research

Method Percentiles and historical matches use only observations available at each point in time. Missing dimensions remain missing. Public price outcomes and cross-market analogues are deliberately absent.