GPGrossPatternRESEARCH SYSTEM
SEC CHECK OPERATIONAL
GROSSPATTERN / FUNDAMENTAL STATE / POINT IN TIME

BOC · Jun 30, 2019

BOSTON OMAHA Corp. A multidimensional configuration derived from the filing available at this observation—never a composite score or recommendation.

STATE CAPABILITYLEVEL 3[email protected]
Inspectable configuration

State dimensions

Filing0001437749-19-016233General Corporate
Capex intensity14thOwn-history percentile · N=14
Evidence method

Level · gp.fundamentals.capex_revenue_ratio

5.44% · OPTIONAL · VALID

Operating cash generation100thOwn-history percentile · N=18
Evidence method

Ratio · gp.fundamentals.operating_cash_flow + gp.fundamentals.revenue

26.22% · OPTIONAL · VALID

Revenue growth71thOwn-history percentile · N=14
Evidence method

Yoy · gp.fundamentals.revenue

239.14% · CORE · VALID

Gross margin7thOwn-history percentile · N=14
Evidence method

Level · gp.fundamentals.gross_margin

58.62% · CORE · VALID

Operating margin100thOwn-history percentile · N=17
Evidence method

Level · gp.fundamentals.operating_margin

-31.59% · CORE · VALID

As-filed lineage

Fundamental state history

Each observation is tied to the filing and facts available at that report date. Amendments remain separate.

History45 statesSelf-history eligible
Period transition

What moved in the state?

Capex Intensity Decreased
Previous
9.70%
Current
5.44%
Delta
-4.26%
Cash Generation Increased
Previous
2.60%
Current
26.22%
Delta
23.62%
Growth Increased
Previous
222.74%
Current
239.14%
Delta
16.40%
Margin Increased
Previous
56.13%
Current
58.62%
Delta
2.49%
Profitability Increased
Previous
-52.55%
Current
-31.59%
Delta
20.97%
Self-history only

Previous similar states

Similarity compares compatible valid dimensions from this issuer's own point-in-time history. No market-return claim is attached.

Not enough compatible prior states for a transparent self-history match.
Research Graph

Related governed research

Method Percentiles and historical matches use only observations available at each point in time. Missing dimensions remain missing. Public price outcomes and cross-market analogues are deliberately absent.