GPGrossPatternRESEARCH SYSTEM
SEC CHECK OPERATIONAL
GROSSPATTERN / DETERMINISTIC EVIDENCE / V3

GILD financial changes

Ranked by interpretable importance, issuer history, magnitude, and accounting profile. No directional recommendation.

Search securities →
LOW IMPORTANCEFinancial Value0TH HISTORICAL PCTL

Trade receivables decreased 1.7%

Trade receivables changed -1.7% from the comparable as-filed period. The change ranks at the 0th percentile of 4 prior comparable changes. This reverses 2 consecutive comparable moves in the opposite direction.

$5.1B$5.0B4 prior comparisons
MEDIUM IMPORTANCEFinancial Value100TH HISTORICAL PCTL

Debt / assets moved 840 bp higher

Debt / assets changed +840 basis points from the comparable as-filed period. The change ranks at the 100th percentile of 4 prior comparable changes. This reverses 2 consecutive comparable moves in the opposite direction.

44.77%53.17%4 prior comparisons
LOW IMPORTANCEFinancial Value75TH HISTORICAL PCTL

Noncurrent long-term debt increased 7.6%

Noncurrent long-term debt changed +7.6% from the comparable as-filed period. The change ranks at the 75th percentile of 4 prior comparable changes. This reverses 2 consecutive comparable moves in the opposite direction.

$22.1B$23.8B4 prior comparisons
LOW IMPORTANCEFinancial Value0TH HISTORICAL PCTL

Gross debt increased 5.2%

Gross debt changed +5.2% from the comparable as-filed period. The change ranks at the 0th percentile of 4 prior comparable changes. This reverses 2 consecutive comparable moves in the opposite direction.

$24.9B$26.2B4 prior comparisons
LOW IMPORTANCEFinancial Value0TH HISTORICAL PCTL

Reported total debt increased 5.2%

Reported total debt changed +5.2% from the comparable as-filed period. The change ranks at the 0th percentile of 4 prior comparable changes. This reverses 2 consecutive comparable moves in the opposite direction.

$24.9B$26.2B4 prior comparisons

Method Importance combines metric-family relevance, magnitude, issuer-history unusualness, persistence, and financial-statement significance. It is analytical prioritization, not a legal materiality conclusion or investment signal.